This discussion reviews the possible deterministic implications of the Theory of Universal Oscillation – article published under “Other theories”  on Toequest.

 

The proposed integration of the relativistic and non-locality/singularity milieu’s through  perpetual oscillation results in a pervading deterministic influence. Included in this dynamic is a proposed deterministic effect upon the process of evolution. Current theories of evolution contend that random mutation within a time-mass-space domain gives rise to physical traits which may or may not be advantageous for survival in a given environment. The summation of progressively selected-out traits gives rise to the evolution of organisms and the extended physical environment. If this theory is now integrated with the oscillation dynamic, it becomes obvious that information transfer within the singularity/non-locality milieu will influence this evolutionary process. Noting that the resultant flux within the singularity incorporates information which is timeless and spaceless, a degree of deterministic influence upon evolution must necessarily occur.

 

Facets of determinism are also manifest in the individual components of this  integration which includes  basic elemental properties, the relativistic and non-locality milieu’s as well as human consciousness.

 

1.   A review of the components of  integration

         

1.1 Fundamental Elemental Properties

 

The properties of the basic elements have remained unchanged since the origin of our earthly environment. The properties of the elements  determines their interaction with all other elements which in turn gives rise to our physical environment. It is these basic elements which have supported the evolution from simple, inanimate compounds, to compound organic matter which in turn has evolved into living organisms.

     

The second law of thermodynamics states that systems are inherently  driven to move to their lowest energy states – a state characterized by  maximum disorder or entropy.

 

The properties of our basic elements and their interactions have  remained remarkably constant. In effect they have defied the second law of thermodynamics because the integrities of the elements are  maintained.

 

Interpretation: The fundamental properties of the elements have been  deterministically programmed to support the evolution from the primordial elemental state into life forms with the ultimate emergence of human consciousness.

 

 

1.2 Mass-Energy Influences

 

     It has been proposed that the physical environment is the resultant

     manifestation of a perpetual oscillation between mass-energy conforming to

     relativistic laws on the one hand and non-locality (singularity), entanglement

     laws on the other.

 

     The interaction of mass-energy within the relativistic physical domain is

     determined by the collective of intrinsic elemental properties within a

     perpetually changing milieu. This dynamic is modulated by entanglement 

     influences operating independent of time and space. In this way, the

     behaviour of mass-energy entities is modified and orchestrated by

     timeless-spaceless data representing similar entities (subatomic, atomic

     and molecular). The mode of influence is instantaneous resonance

     (independent of time and space constraints).

 

     Interpretation: Evolution of the species through the natural selection of

     advantageous traits is influenced both by  intrinsic elemental properties as

     well as by non-locality information. Evolution is thus a deterministic

     process insofar as it incorporates modulating influences derived from a far

     more extensive integration.

 

1.3 Human Consciousness

 

Human consciousness is perceived in the relativistic domain as a process in which environmental entities and their associations are observed and integrated. The integration develops into an understanding of the environment which evolves into a unique subjective reality. All subsequent conscious (and unconscious) action  is modulated by this integration.

 

If the neuro-psychological integration be analogous to digital circuitry, then the unique individual design of the circuitry is a product of all prevailing influences at the time of its development – in the context of the nature-nurture dynamic. But these influences emanate both from the relativistic domain as well as from non-locality/singularity information.

 

The unique circuitry will subsequently select out  elements in the environment which are synchronous with its configuration. The neuro-psychological circuitry thus selects out, or filters, appropriate segments of the environmental spectrum.

 

Neuro-psychological circuitry will also undergo the mass-energy oscillation with the non-locality domain and thereby both contribute to the timeless-spaceless database as well as deriving therefrom. It is while within the non-locality domain that the energy-frequency equivalent of the neuro-psychological configuration is manifest. Connectivity of all neuro-psychological energy-frequencies with the energy-frequencies of all other mass-energy entities will occur through resonance within the non-locality domain.

 

Conscious focus on segments of the environment moves the mass-energy equilibrium towards the physical mass side. The physical nature of entities either materializes or is modified by conscious focus. This phenomenon can be viewed as the consequence of the connectivity which occurs between all mass-energy and between all neuro-psychological mass-energy-frequencies.

 

Interpretation: The human brain and the phenomenon of consciousness that it supports, represents a point of unique individual convergence of multiple influences, both relativistic and non-local. The brain then becomes a source of coherence in which energy-frequencies reflecting the unique neuro-psychological mass-energy, select out mass-energy entities in the environment which are resonant with itself. A unique interference pattern emerges from this coherent frequency interaction.

 

This unique coherence of frequencies represents  the contribution of each individual to the non-locality, mass-energy-frequency database.  The resultant unique interference pattern represents the specific identification of the individual consciousness within the non-locality milieu. Each newly perceived environmental association, its materialization and resultant energy-frequencies that arise thereby, serves to enhance the non-locality energy-frequency database.

 

     Neuro-psychological circuitry that incorporates a wide spectrum of 

     environmental associations will be highly integrated. Its representative

     energy-frequency range for coherence is consequently broad and is

     termed broad-band coherence.  Conversely, poorly integrated circuitry will

     be represented by a narrow spectrum of energy-frequency and is termed

     narrow-band coherence.

2. Death and the Purpose of Existence

 

    It becomes apparent that the unique interference pattern of each individual

    persists independent of physical death. Data which is integral to the non-

    locality milieu assumes timeless and spaceless properties. The data also

    retains its integrity by virtue of its unique interference pattern. The persistence

    of this data in the form of energy-frequency, supports resonance within the

    non-locality milieu and between the non-locality and  the relativistic milieu.

 

    The process described above may be summarized as follows:

 

• The non-locality milieu perpetually materializes into the relativistic domain
• Data exchange between the domains is maintained through oscillation
• Human consciousness contributes to both the materialization process as well as to the database of the non-locality domain

 

    As this process continues, the database of the non-locality milieu becomes

    enhanced which in turn has a direct effect on the relativistic domain. The

    process of enhancement equates to an expansion of knowledge and

    understanding  of the nature of all things. This evolution of consciousness, I

    contend, is the purpose of our existence.

 

    In this relativistic domain, our individual consciousnesses reflect our personal

    coherence spectra. If we were to become conscious of the vast database of

    the non-locality milieu we would experience superconsciousness. I believe that

    the way to inherit  superconsciousness is by integrating an awareness of the

    totality of the oscillatory process described above.  But integration of segments

    of the environment is conditional to their inclusion within our coherence

    spectra. One concludes therefore that the inheritance of superconsciousness

    is dependant upon convergence factors in every human being and in itself will

    select out those receptive to the process.

Spontaneous Breakdown of Symmetry and The Great Achievement of Achieving True Supersymmety

Needless to say, this theory is aiming at being a Great Achievement of Some Sort Someday...:)

My prior blog was about the how Gallileo Gallilei Equivalence Principle - equating Inertial Mass to Gravitational Mass - threw off scientists into believing that there was an Spontaneous Breakdown of Symmetry between the Four Fundamental Fources of Physics..:)

Here, I should repeat the Fantastic Four: Gravitation, Electromagnetism, Strong and Weak Forces.

It should be clear to anyone who reads this blog that the Strong Force was replaced by simple local Fabric of Space deformational energy (Force). Weak force, which is responsible for the beta decay, was eliminated when I changed the paradigm for Nuclear Chemistry to Nonlinear Hadronics (similar to Nonlinear Optics).

If you are familiar with the symmetries associated with these forces, the Strong Force requires an infinite force at infinite distance while the others require Infinite Forces at Zero Distances. This means that the supersymmetric force would require infinite force on both extremes...:)

By eliminating the Strong and Weak forces by substituting them by infinitely simpler paradigms, I eliminated this symmetry requirement. The Strong Force is a direct byproduct of the Standard Model. The introduction of spurious Quarks which couldn't ever be seen resulted in the introduction of spurious forces that act in a crazy way... They GLUED things together to explain a null result or failed experiment.

I am sure someone is going to ask me how could the results of the Standard Model be so precise and yet be wrong...:) Well, well... the first question to ask is if the Standard Model has parameters..>:) Given enough degrees of freedom one can solve any problem to any precision.

My theory has no degrees of freedom. In lieu of a degree of freedom, it has the fundamental dilator paradigm, which places the 4D Masses of the Proton and Electron equal to the 3D Mass of an Hydrogen Atom...:) or half of the 4DMass of an Hydrogen Atom...

One might say that this is a parameter. I beg to differ. It is a paradigm..:) one that goes hand in hand with the Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe (another paradigm which explains 3D Universe expansion without Dark Energy, Dark Matter etc), Hubble constant etc.
Together with these two paradigm, I placed the Quantum Lagrangian Principle stating that a fundamental dilator would only dilate in phase with surrounding dilaton fields, that is, a dilator wouldn't try to expand space in a point when everyone else is trying to compress that region of space...:) Another simple paradigm that can be shown in a simple experiment similar to the one where sand patterns are created in a vibrating drum...:)

The remaining asymmetry is due to the different masses of Protons and Electrons...:) If they had exactly the same mass, one could formulate an electromagnetic theory based upon positive and negative masses - in analogy to Gravitation (formulated in terms of neutral masss).

The simple solution to the problem was to rewrite Gauss and Newton's Laws in a 4D Spatial Manifold where a shockwave Universe traverses a Cartesian 4D Manifold at the speed of light...:)

The reformulated Gauss and Newton's Laws are similar to the 3D ones. The only difference are in the constants... and in the fact that in 4D your are twice as Fat!!!!!!

According to the Fundamental Dilator Paradigm, Gravitational 4D Masses of Electrons and Protons are proportional to the coherently aggregated 4D Displacement volumes associated with the Fundamental Dilator cycle. This is because the transitions occur in phase with the generated waves. This is because the source of the dilaton field travels at the same speed as the dilaton field itself...:)

Remember, the fundamental dilator is a lightspeed traversing shape-shifting displacement volume (metric modulation) that changes the distances between any two points diametrically positioned around it. That volume displacement can be an small dilation (electron), a big dilation (antiproton), a small compression (positron) or a big compression (proton).


Since all these phases occur as the dilator travels radially at the speed of light on the center of a horospherical reference frame, all the waves generated by each phase add in phase, thus it is the same effect as if one had an electron-positron dilator and a proton-antiproton dilator in their appropriate phases.

For this reason, I say that the 4DMass of an electron is the same as the 4D mass of a proton. I equate this to the atomic mass of a hydrogen atom. This means that an hydrogen atom will have the 4DMass of two Hydrogen Atoms..>:) or weight twice as much in 4D as they weight in 3D...:)

Notice that each phase of the fundamental dilator coherence is not a particle. Each one of the four fundamental particles (proton, antiproton, electron and positron) are represented by the same ever-repeating coherence, differing only by which phase is in phase with the shockwave 3D Universe.

This means that all equations of electromagnetism can be derived (and were derived in my papers) from an equation identical to Newton's Gravitation Law. The only difference is that one uses the mass of one hydrogen atom when calculating the number of dilators (electron or protons) per 4D Kilogram...:)

Without going into too many details here, it is late...:), it should be clear how the concept of the Fundamental Dilator eliminates the last asymmetry in the Fantastic Two..:) the last two standing forces..:)

The concept of Inertia, which puzzled mankind forever was explained in simple terms as the "area" of deformation in a Stress/Strain paradigm. This simple linear equation replaces Newton's Second Law (F=m.a) with a tremendous advantage. It doesn't introduce the concepts of Mass and Force..:) It keeps it all geometrical...:) as they say on the streets..:) Keep it Geometrical..:)

It is disappointing to many, me included, that inertia didn't keep the nonlocal nature proposed by Mach. It would be nice if we all could be part of the whole in a cryptic manner like the one expressed in - the part is equal to the whole..:) etc..

Sometimes it is nice that our philosophical mind is let down...:) One doesn't really need to have the part equal to the whole - the duality supplanted by a trinity..etc... or four huge turtles holding the Universe in place....or the Celestial Spheres being replaced by Celestial Hyperspheres...:)

Just take what life gives you and make the most of it...:)

This theory illuminates the path to an Infinite and Clean Source of Energy, The Promise of Space Travel .... it takes away some crazy ideas like wormhole travels or going into a Black Holes or whatever you might had concocted to look really smart in your latest paper...:)

Take Off Your Kazoos and Let Cellebrate The Arrival of Our 12,000 reader.

Thanks for taking the time and spreading the word about this work. It has been done with the belief that Ideas Are Important ...:)

They should always face scrutiny...:) I've just scrutinized Gallileo, Newton and Everyone who wasted time talking about wormhole travel..>:) Just make enough progress to go around the Solar System first...:)

By the way, scrutiny is always welcome...:) Leave your comments or email me directly ... The email adress is in my profile.

Cheers,

MP

The Silence of The Lambs..:)

Life is stranger than fiction. In July, I will be joining a group of rebelious scientists in a Castle in Wales to discuss our proposed alternatives to the Standard Model. Hopefully, I will find a way to create the experiment that will prove the existence of Coherent Nuclear Processes...:) Imagine a thermonuclear explosion traveling only in a single direction, in an extremely narrow beam...:) and in a controlled manner...:)

This simple idea might save your soul when the Asteroid comes down in 2029..:)

Of course, this experiment has to be done in the Large Hadron Collider...:) but maybe Livermore might be good enough for testing it in a smaller scale...

This blog is about to reach its 16,000 unique IP readers...:) Hurray!!!!

I didn't know there were so many cosmologists, string theorists, particle physicists in the planet...:)

There are many reasons to celebrate...

The theory has been published in two books:

• Quantization in Astrophysics - containing the Grand Unification and New Cosmology Paradigm
  
• Hadron Physics New Energy Issues - Containing the Hypergeometrical Standard Model

and a third one is to be edited and published soon...The Flying Orchestra

not that bad for something created in the everyday commuting to work (on a shaking NYC subway..>:)

and also the following crowning achievements...:)

1. I corrected Newton's equations by eliminating all non-geometrical elements of Classical Mechanics.
   
2. I kept the theory relativistic despite of introducing Absolute Time and a Preferential Frame of Reference or at least a preferential direction of reference (R).
   
3. Somehow, it seems that I introduced a geometrical interpretation of Lorentz transforms of all things... I did not hear any angry relativistic cosmologists telling me otherwise...which is a surprise... I thought everyone knew that Lorentz transform is a rotation by an imaginary angle...
   
4. I introduced a new model for matter... the first non-obvious model. Up to know things were waves, particles or particle-waves...:) The dilator is a wavegenerator that flows like a wave...:) It is a new paradigm which obeys Quantum Mechanics since its position follows the surrounding dilaton fields and the projection of these dilaton fields are the de Broglie Waves...:)
   
5. The Humble Fundamental Dilator shows how a proton and an electron are the same entity and have the same 4D Mass, thus simplifying tremendously the understanding and unification of the Universe. This paradigm eliminates the asymmetry between Protons and Electrons - they have the same 4D displacement volume or 4D Mass.
   
6. The Fundamental Dilator Paradigm eliminates Electromagnetism and Gravitation asymmetries.
   
7. By replacing the Quark Model (Standard Model) I also eliminated the r:1/r symmetry requirement, thus simplifying the Universe to level that even a String Theorist can understand...:)
   
8. The Humble Fundamental Dilator is also the hidden variable Einstein tried throoughout his whole life to find. The entity that creates Quantum Mechanics.
   
9. I challenged the concept of Field and showed that implicit in it is the existence of a Cosmological Coherence (all dilators in the Universe dilate in synch with their local dilaton fields). Synchronization is evident using absolute time (in the RXYZ frame).
   I Grand Unified all the Forces (Gravitation and Electromagnetism) while providing a replacement for the Gluon-Quark paradigm (the dilator itself) and for the Electroweak force (the advent of nonlinear hadronics)...
   
10. In replacing the Gluon-Quark paradigm I modified the symmetry requirements for a Grand Unification or Supersymmetry Theory. The pesky Reciprocal Symmetry is eliminated and with that the need that everything very slow to have the same energy as everything very fast...:) This is an outrageous symmetry... Physicist should be kissing my ring for eliminating such nasty constraint....:)
    
11. I proposed the solution for all energy problems in the shape of fusion reactors while produce fusion (or fission) products along a single direction (or cone)...:) Energy is readily extracted through magneto-hydrodynamics means... Charged products make up powerful currents to be slowed down by reversed accelerators...:)
    
12. I proposed a now topology for the Cosmos...:) which eliminates the need for Einstein Cosmological Constant, dark energy, inflation... This at a time when inflationary people are adjusting their parameters to explain the whole chimichanga...:) Very unfortunate...:) At least at this time, I would love to say Ockham's Razor... People have already readied their acceptance speeches for the Nobel Ceremony...:) Horrible situation...:)
    
13. In creating this new topology, I explained why the speed of light is the limiting speed in our Fabric of Space..(3D Universe)...
    
14. I acknowledged that in fact things can move faster than the speed of light by traveling (surfing) along an interference pattern...:) This might be someday used to create superluminal traveling when people learn how to pattern dilaton fields...:) or die waiting to ride a Tachyon driven spacecraft...:)
    
15. I provided the equations to Cosmological Constants (vacuum permittivity and magnetic susceptibility).
    
16. I also showed that the Gravitational Constant is not constant and scaled down with the inverse of the age of the Universe....:) Earlier times had stronger Gravitational fields..>:)
    
17. The Gravitational "constant" dependence provides the blueprint for the demise of the Universe...:) The relaxation of the dilators... A totally new Cosmogony..>:)
    
18. I provided an alternative explanation for the Action-At-Distance paradox which bothered Einstein so much and that is the basis for a total delusional state of mind where people throw their hands up and accept anything..:) from time travel to time traveling backwards in Black Holes ... to Black Holes...:)
    
19. I also provided an alternative explanation for the Double Slit Experiment. In my theory, dilators (electron included) travel on a four dimensional space at the center of a horospherical reference frame. The waves it creates are the same it surfs, that is, the electron surfs a four-dimensional wave (dilaton field) and by simple projection, it also surfs the 3D projection (de Broglie waves). This means that the de Broglie wave is not a matter wave. Instead, it is a metric deformation wave created by the dilator. The much larger wavelength is due to the way things are projected in an hyperbolic space... The electron in the two slit experiment will travel through a single slit while its dilaton field projection will travel through both...:) On the other side of the barrier, the electron will continue to surf the interferometric dilaton fields and thus will deposit itself on an interferometric pattern onto the detector..:) Very simple and again I would love to say, Ockham's Razor... despite my qualms about its usage...:)
    
20. I provided a simple multi-coherence (dilator dimensional chords) description for each and every hyperon and isotope (isotopes are trivial since they only have protons and neutrons)...: )
    
21. I provided an alternative solution to the mass paradigm by assigning it to an overlapping 4D volume (dilator overlapping with the fabric of space at specific phases of the dilator spinning).
    
22. I created an extrinsic representation for the Spin.... that obscure quantity that bothered so many quantum physics students for so long...:) and explained What the Hell is the meaning of 1/2 ... as you might know rotation description does not include any quadratic potential and thus there isn't any zero point rotation....:) It was always a bothering 1/2 to me...:)
    
23. In making Spin extrinsic, I introduced the delightful Girlfriend on a Swing Gedanken Experiment to show how time could be Pseudo-Quantized..>:)
    
24. I corrected all Newton's equations (Four of them) and provided the really relativistic Biot-Savart law. That law can be used to project better Tokamaks if that is the way one wants to proceed.
    
25. Einstein also got his share...:) In creating an Absolute Time and explaining the meaning of inertia, I rebutted Mach's principle of nonlocal interaction and restored Newton's Absolute Time..>:) which times the existence of the Universe as opposed to our short existence...:)
    
26. I did all this by looking into what people did right and throwing away without fear what people did wrong...:) That was easy since I don't have to write this as a grant to my reactionary peers..:)
    
27. Most of all, I told you that the most important outlet for Physics - The Cornell-Los Alamos E-Print Repository should be in the hands of someone more capable than Paul Ginsparg. It is a shame Science can be silenced by arbitrary actions of a single person...:)

I also pleaded for my Lambs not to remain silent and to speak up their minds. I value criticism and would be happy to post any one of your meaningful comments. I know that in those nine thousand readers many are scientists (professional scientists).

What I expect from them is either a statement telling me that I made a mistake here or there or some active action against the barriers that precluded a more wider distribution of this theory, namely, to request, demand that my theory receives a 1 megabyte space on the Cornell-Los Alamos E-Print Repository hard drive..:) NOT TOO MUCH TO ASK...:)

I've fulfilled all the requirements to post the theory there... (already peer-reviewed, published work that has been endorsed)...:)

I would welcome anyone to take the initiative to publish my paper on the Cornell-Los Alamos Arxives. :)

The pdf is here. This is a shorter version of the theory. Just below 1 megabyte length. It was accepted and endorsed the last time I attempted posting it there.

As I mentioned, I would be eternally grateful to anyone (My Giordano Bruno) that would bring this work to a wider audience through posting it at the Arxives or through forwarding this blog link or the pdfs to other people...

Considering that this theory provides a new paradigm for Coherent Nuclear Fusion, the planet you might save might be yours...:)

Feynman wouldn't blink in face of this challenge...:)

The current version of the work is here.

I know that if you do so, Paul Ginsparg might place you on his blacklist. I know that I am not a professional scientist any longer..:) I know it all....

I also know the VALUE OF IDEAS and that they are worth fighting for. I don't expect any thing less from a scientist (professional or not)...

Just think, "What would Richard P. Feynman do????"

Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars - mere globs of gas atoms. I, too, can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? Richard P. Feynman

Don't make me explain analogies:

• Poets - String Theorist, Supersymmetrists...Gauge Physicists...:)
  
• the Beauty of the Stars - The Beauty of Weyl Fermions, Higgs, Bosons, Dirac Matrices, etc...
  
• Mere globs of gas atoms - My humble and simple theory
  
• Feynman - The little me...

Cheers,

MP

PS_I wonder if my friends from the Laser Laboratory at UofR or at the Fermi Lab are reading the changes in paradigm for nuclear fusion....:) I once told Professor Huizenga while attending a party at his house, that I knew how to make a Gamma Ray laser... He looked very surprised and most likely somewhat amused..>:)

I am sure that in his mind briefly passed those concerns about the problems pumping an ultrafast decaying nuclear transition, etc... As usual, people can only think within the paradigms they lived by...I wasn't able to create any interest in that brief interaction...:)

I told the same thing to Pat Holton many years ago... Life is full of hits and misses...As usual , I would love to hear from my friends at UPenn, Princeton, Berkeley, UofChicago..>:) CERN, Steven Hawking comes to mind, the 5Dimension Centre, USAF, Whiteman Airforce Base, The Institute for Advanced Studies, well, the Devil Himself (I mean, Paul Ginsparg).....>:)

The God Particle

Forgive me saying something against a God Particle, but this is a stretch... Not unlike Inflation Theory ( in fact, these are my two pet peeves)...

I am not saying that the Fundamental Dilator is the only possible solution to the problem of Mass.

I made Mass totally disappear with it...:) I succesfully replaced Mass with displacement 4D volumes within a spinning coherence: The Fundamental Dilator

Above are two electrons with opposing spins...:) and the best explanation for the existence of Cooper pairs and the why of Hund's Law. Opposing spinning electrons show zero attraction or repulsion among each other...:) That is why you can put them neatly into orbitals...:)

I also explained why one Kilogram (inertial) of Electrons have Zero Gravitational Mass...:) Just a result of interaction averaging out to zero.

While Peter Higgs, François Englert and Robert Brout were trying to explain Mass using some God Given Particle or God Himself, I explained Mass Away...

People shouldn't mix Religion references and Science. It would be horrible if one cannot see the God Boson coming out of those Large Hadron Collider Collisions...

By the way, we know that we can make "Bosons" out of collisions (e.g. Delta Zero, Pion Zero).

Is Dr. Higgs telling me that Delta Zero, Pion Zero are The False ProphetParticles?

How would you know that you created a Boson that gives Mass to a particle... Just because it has some weight (Mass)..:) given to itself?? That would be a quite weak proof of the existence of the God Particle...

I would expect something along the lines of the God Boson coming down the pipe and interacting wih another humble particle and bestowing it the Gift of Masslessness...:) such that it would just fly faster than the speed of light out of there...:) That would make me a believer..

Of course, if one could keep such God Particle around one long enough, one could ask for larger favors like making an Apple to fall upwards or downwards at infinite speed...:)

In summary, I don't believe it is possible to attach to an extremely short-lived particle coming out of a collider the title of God Particle. It is my believe that I will have just to believe..:)

I already believe that the Truth is Out There...:)

I certainly know that whatever comes out of those collisions would be less relevant than Coherent Nuclear Fusion. I am partial...what can I say..>:)

Today, I learned that there is a great theory out there which is the most accepted geometric relativistic theory. I am looking forward to read about it... I've never managed to ask if that theory contains the concept of Mass. If a contain that awful concept, it can never be really geometrical..:)

Of course, I might be wrong, but in General Relativity, Mass takes a quite important place...:)

My theory is consistent with General Relativity but it doesn't contain Mass.

By the way, I somehow seek exactly the people who might disagree with me to collegially discuss ideas. There is little value in preaching to the choir...:)

Please, support the site...:) Everytime one clicks the Bird below, a matching grant is issued to help in the search of the God Particle...:)

I want to Believe..

Cheers,

MP

My Inflationary Mind

I wrote a few times about the strong shortcomings of the Inflation Theory by Alan Guth.

I will try to make this as simple as possible.

Some time ago, someone (Arno Penzias) discovered the Microwave Cosmic Background. It was soon realized that no matter where you look at, the cosmic background was there.... That gives you a sinking feeling, since the explanation for it was the cooled down initial radiation associated with the Big Bang. I mentioned cooled down since the associated temperature of the Black Body is 2.75 Kelvin. The fact that it is called Background is because it is pervasive and pretty much isotropic... This precludes any explanation other than the Universe is in a reflective box and it is exchanginc heat with something else very cold and it took forever to reach thermal equilibrium since this box is 15 billion light years wide...:)

Of course, this is not exactly The Inflation Theory. Since we are now in a big box, Alan Guth considered that we were in a smaller box sometime ago..:) thus he placed the equilibrium event to happen during that time... Somehow the whole Universe managed to cool down to 2.75 degrees (by irradiating into some really Black Body - the Beyond or Naught or whatever one can conjure up). At that point, the little box increased in size at a speed larger than the speed of light into our current big box...

This is unpalatable...
1)It fails to provide a reasonable explanation for the heat exchange process- what is the sink
2)It makes the Universe to be a 3D reflective box
3) It doesn't tell you what is outside the box and when they say something about the Beyond, they say that the space is being created ...:)
4) Nobody other than myself imagine the initial Big Bang to be a gentle event. In any expansion, the initial energy is totally or mostly kinetic, and the initial state corresponds to a very high temperature. It doesn't make sense to have that energy being transferred into something else (the unexplained sink) and then continue an expansion...

Needless to say, that is simply stupid... Not the association with the Big Bang....That is evident or at least a very good guess. The problem is that the initial extremely hot Universe is suppose to reach thermal equilibrium and cool down (I suppose by radiative cooling into Nothing...:) to 2.725 degrees Kelvin...

This blog is a call for arms to bring your critical sense back to life... How in the world could you sit through someone saying that suspending all the laws of Physics was the only way to explain a pervasive background.

My proposed topology does the same without breaking any law...:)

Let's start from the beginning:

Some earlier time, someone ele (Edwin Hubble) discovered that the farther a star is from us, the larger the red-shift of cosmic absorption or emission lines. This was interpreted as an indication of expansion. Since the red-shifting was all over the place (isotropic), that is, whatever direction you look at you could find red-shiffted emission lines or absorption lines indicating an Universe in expansion.

Fascinatingly, the analogy used to explain this step has been dots in an expanding baloon. As the baloon expands the dots get farther apart.

This is amazing because somehow nobody managed to see the four dimensional baloon with a three dimensional hypersurface that I proposed.

Inflation theory gets its name because it tries to explain the homogeneity of the cosmic background by introducing an ultrafast expansion of the visible 3D Universe.

So let me say it again. In the Inflation Theory, the Universe starts, get's very hot inside a small little box, reach thermal equilibrium, cools down (by radiative cooling into the Naugth, into the NADA) and them expands to current size in a jiffy.

There are many problems with this picture, evident problems and I certainly lost my respect towards any scientist who recited these really stupid ideas without any subsequent criticism.

Alan Guth is not guilty of anything. I am sure he is a Brainiac, no sarcasm intented. He created a really bad model and was able to convince people... It takes a great mind to do that...

The problem is the people who didn't analyze it properly.

Guth is now at MIT...:) a solid member of the Physics Fraternity...:)

I cannot fathom why this model is out there... How can such an aberration like it be accepted by "Scientists"... I guess, there aren't many real ones left..>:)

Where have you gone, Mr Feynman? Our nation turns its lonely eyes to you... :)

It suspends the laws of physics unnecessarily, namely superluminal expansion of the whole universe...:) following an unnatural cooling process ... It boogles my mind.

I put the two observations together (Hubble Red-Shifting of Radiation) and the isotropy of the Microwave Cosmic Background and realized that by suggesting a Four-Dimensional Space where our 3D Space is a traveling shockwave (lightspeed) one could easily explain everythihng.

Imagine that you are body-surfing a wave...Now imagine making waves on the surface of that wave... This Gedanken experiment is certainly possible and the waves will propagate at whatever speed they naturally propagate.

The Icon of the Hypergeometrical Theory shown above is always shown at the beginning of each blog (almost always). The reason is simple: I want you to realize all the nuances associated with this topology.

If you now imagine that you are surfing this circular wave, then you will realize that any ripple you created at the beginning of times (when the 4D Universe radius was very small) will be now reaching some distant star one radian (circa 15 billion light years) away and according to Hubble, it will be very red-shifted.

The topology means that conversely you will be watching the beginning of time events if you look far enough (15 billion light years away) in any direction. The light coming from those events will be very red-shifted, because you would be actually looking down to the center of the lightspeed expanding hypersphere...

Now you realize that the Hypergeometrical Universe Topology (lightspeed expanding hyperspherical shockwave Universe) does explain the isotropy and homogeneity of the Microwave Cosmic Background. It does that without suspending any physical law.

I proposed that the Microwave Cosmic Background is the red-shifted initial Gamma Ray Burst (or X-Ray burst)...:) Gamma and X rays are electromagnetic waves and they will suffer Doppler shift.

You cannot imagine the frustration I feel everytime Michio Kako or other talking head "explains" Inflation Theory, Time-Travel or any other stupid concept.

It is a disservice to scientific thought have so many speculative shows on TV and not a single debating show or the possibility to have a real debate in science (follow my links about censorship). Theories like the Inflationary Universe does not withstand the most basic scrutiny!

People say that it can predict current ripples in the mass distribution of the Universe. Of course, it can... Any theory can if you give the correct initial conditions..>:) including mine..:)

As usual, I am open to your point of view and a good debate...:) Don't be a Chicken...:)

Cheers,

MP

Hypergeometrical Cooper Pairs and Superconductivity

I was invited to represent the student body at the celebration of the 50 Years of the Laboratory for the Research of the Structure of Matter at Penn. It was an honor and I was dazzled by the sights of the Fathers of Quantum Mechanics in academic regallia.

I sat on my chair waiting for the beginning of the talks. The gentleman on my side decided to make small talk with that young student- the little me...:) He mentioned his name:Schrieffer... I immediatelly said, " Well, I only know one Schrieffer- from Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) Superconducting Theory... "

I don't really remember what did I say afterwards, but I know that I displayed way too much reverence and poor Bob Schrieffer felt unconfortable and managed to scape...:)

I know for sure that I was hyperventilating...:)

What can I say. I was a naive, wide-eyed student, full of admiration and respect for my fellow scientists and mainly for the visionaries who brought us to our present understanding... I didn't know that I had to play it cool, not to disturb the scientific celebrities...:)

Today, I am going to explain the why there is a formation of a Cooper Pair, that is, why two mutually repulsive electrons would agree to walk togetther in a correlated manner...:)

Not unlike in the case of Alan Guth's Inflation Theory of the Universe, the formation of a Cooper pair requires the absolute turning off of all critical sense in your Brains...:) Equally charge particles are mortal enemies and repeal each other with a force singularly dependent upon their distance..:) That is, the force goes to infinite when they are close..>:) Infinite!!!!!

That bitter pill is gilded by words like "One build a Boson out of two Fermions"...:)

This sounds great but it doesn't mean anything..:)

This would mean something if there were a logical link between spin and charge...:) Current Science has no such logical connection.

My theory provides the logical link between spin and charge.

I hope you will pay the required attention to understand that the reason why you can place a bunch of Hypergeometrical Cooper Pairs close together is because their net interaction is ZERO and it is not because you called it a Boson nor because the pair has zero spin!!!...:)

You know, the Electron was always a Fermion until BCS came up with the concept of Cooper pair. This is a dress-up but it doesn't provide any substancial explanation why a Cooper pair doesn't interact. In this very short blog, I provided such explanation and eliminated the need to dress an Electron as a Boson...:) This doesn't mean anything and doesn't provide any physical insight that will allow for the creation of Room Temperature Superconductors or other more relevant discoveries.

Any dilator has spin otherwise it would had recombined with its antidilator and returned into Nothing...;) The Universe is composed only of dilators which can get together to make things that does not apparently spin. It is just appearances. Things always spins...It just happens that two four-dimensional spins can be seem in three dimensions as a 3D pseudo-rotation..:)

The physics is invisible to your eyes and instruments. It can only be seem with the eyes of the mind... and I have some teardrops to clarify this subject...:)
As I did in Newton First Law, I will provide the Why? You know that Why is the question that will destroy any Cybernetic Supercomputer Hell Bent on World Domination...:)

Why is normally left to Theology and in Science it is always dressed up as a Principle (Equivalence Principle in Quantum Mechanics or Gravitation/Inertia, or Hamilton Principle etc) or sometimes it becomes a Conjecture..:) which is the lowest level of scientific speculation...

What I am detailing here has already been mentioned in my papers and books but I guess it is always worthwhile to draw a picture...:)

Let's draw the two electrons with opposing spins:



You might notice something different between the two electrons. When they spin in different directions they reach different mid-points. In the spin 0.5 electron, the next state is an antiproton on its side, while it is a proton in the spin -0.5 electron (or vice-versa depeding upon definition). Of course, here we have two electron and two anti-electron phases repeling each other but we also have two proton-antiproton phases attracting each other... Thus the net repulsion is ZERO...:) That is much smaller than INFINITE ..:)

From Antenae Theory you should also notice that since the Proton and Antiprotons are sideways, their attraction will only be felt in close proximity...:) Near-Field is the correct terminology...

This means that there is a difference between having two electrons with the same spin and two of opposing spins.

As in the Little Prince blog, What is essential is invisible to the Eyes

The difference happens to be observable only in the four dimension and only when we don't have a material existence...:)

This difference is not some obscure and unexplained exchange energy..:) Instead one has an electrostatic interaction between Protons and Antiprotons in a four-dimensional spatial manifold. The subject of binding energy is to be studied by adding a relative kinetic energy (temperature) to the pair. A Cooper Pair with a non-zero temperature will have a net interaction that can be calculated by magnetism, and thus can be calculated in the spacetime side of the Hypergeometrical Universe Icon above. Please read the paper or books to understand how magnetism is modeled in hypergeometrical terms.

That, in a nutshell, is the reason WHY there are Cooper pairs...

It is also the physical reason for the exchange energy in Quantum Mechanics.

Cheers,

MP

PS- Next I will start with how to calculate the Mass (3D Volume overlap) of a Neutron... I will follow with the Hyperons and all isotopes..:)

This is how you will be able to design the stable new elements for your spaceships...:)

Blunders, Blunders by the Kilogram

Gallileo has a blunder associated with his name...:) Nobody scapes... One is always partially wrong, despite of being mostly correct...:) Nothing is perfect...

In fact, nobody knows about this blunder until now...:)

Of course, these are not really blunders. It wasn't like Gallileo or Newton made the incorrect choice between two possible models, in which one was clearly supperior given the data available at the time of the decision.

Newton and Gallileo and even Einstein didn't have access to data that would hint the existence of a better model. It is really not a Blunder at all!!!! Silly people would call the introduction of a constant in an equation a Blunder, but the constant could be zero..>:), thus its addition not only satisfies the homogeneous case but leave space for another scenario. The constant was to be determined experimentally...:) I don't consider that a Blunder..>:)

I consider the introduction of a constant without a physical explanation for it a sleight of hand...:)

What was Gallileo's Biggest Blunder? How bad was it?

Let's say that thanks to Gallileo's Equivalence Principle we were not able to find an existing symmetry between Gravitation and Electromagnetism...:)

Gallileo's Equivalence Principle states that Gravitational Mass and Inertial Mass are the same...:) If one puts together this statement with the often repeated but never thought through statement that an Electron senses both Gravitational and Electric fields , the end result is an expontaneous symmetry breakdown at the beginning of times...:)

My theory states that an Electron (Proton or any charge particle) only senses one interaction - the same interaction (dilaton surfing) that a neutral particle (e.g. Hydrogen atom) senses.

This means that one Kilogram (of inertial mass) of Electrons has no Gravitational Mass...:)

This is a Breakdown of the Gallileo's Equivalence Principle and should be written in BOLD LETTERS

In my theory, Mass has two equivalents - a 4D Displacement Volume Equivalent and a 3D Volume Equivalent.

Using analogy, instead of introducing 4D volumes, strain and stresses, I kept the concept of mass but showed that the 4DMass of an electon is the same as the 4DMass of a Proton and it is equal to the mass of a Hydrogen atom.

Above are the Balls Diagrams for the Electron and Positron. The rotation of the lettering models the Spin 1/2 rotation of the 4D displacement volume associated with the fundamental dilator phases. Four fundamental dilators, each one starting with one of the four phases, correspond to the four basic particles: electron, proton, positron and antiproton.

Positive or Negative (matter or antimatter) are arbitrary phases, thus I define the first Ball as being the one that is in phase with the Hyperspherical Lightspeed Expanding ShockWave Universe.

As you can see, a Proton differs from an Electron just by which of the fundamental dilator phases are in phase with the 3D Universe.

If you think in terms of waves being generated by a shape shifting displacement volume (metric modulation), the metric waves (dilatons) with have an intensity proportional to all the four phases of the fundamental dilator coherence, thus depending upon both the electron phases and the proton phases. This means that the 4DMass is equal to the mass of an Hydrogen Atom. Just in case we have String Theorists in the readership...:) The reason for summing up all phases of the coherences is the result of the coherence being the focus of a reference frame traveling at the speed of light along R - the horospherical reference frame- the radial direction perpendicular to our 3D space. This means that all modulations of the metric are in phase with the traveling waves and add coherently - like voices in a choir...:)

This means that one could write an equation (Gauss Electrostatic Law) for the interaction between charged particles based upon the particles 4D Masses. Under those circumstaces there would be perfect symmetry between a Proton and an Electron and thus Gravitation and Electromagnetism could be written in a single framework. This is what I did in my theory. I introduced the Fat Electron (I used one atomic mass unit for simplicity but later refined the calculations) in my derivation of Electrostatics. The resulting electrostatic force or electrostatic permeability was correct to 0.4% without any adjusting parameters. I gave many possible explanations for the small discrepancy. People can always refined the theory.

Newton's Gravitationa Law states that the interaction between masses is proportional to the produt of masses. The spinning of the fundamental coherence four dimensional displacement volume is such that its overlap with the 3D Universe exists only at 0, pi, 2pi etc phases.

Spin half - that is - the spinning motion has a frequency that is half the tunneling frequency - will result in an stroboscopic view of charged particles. This means that a charge that is negative will always be negative... and vice-versa.

This will also mean that a charge particle senses no Gravitation.

The last part of the Blunder is the recognition that since an electron has an inertial mass different (2000 time smaller) than a proton, then the inertial mass is defined by the overlap between the 4D displacement volume and the 3D space.

If one put together that observation and the Stress-Strain interpretation of Newton's Second Law, one realizes that inertial is a measure of the effort needed to locally deform the Fabric of Space...:) thus proportional to how much Fabric of Space we are talking about...

The amount of Fabric of Space associated with each particle is its footprint on the Shockwave Universe...

I hope it becomes clear that inertial mass and gravitational mass are not the same for charged particles (Fermions if you will..:)

Fermions do not actually produce Gravitation but they field is proportional to their 4D Mass (in analogy to Newton's Gravitational Law)>... Of course, Newton's Gravitational Laws remains the same in a 4D paradigm...:)

The only horrible sideeffect is that we all become twice as fat in 4D than in 3D...:)

Cheers,

MP

ps- some people are hoping to detect some indication of a higher dimensionality by measuring discrepancies between inertial and gravitational masses in a satelite experiment. They are striving to see a 1:10^8 deviation...:) It is a shame...:) There shouldn't be any difference between inertial mass and gravitational mass of neutral matter...>:) If the experiment could measure the 4D mass then the measurement would easily detect a 100% increase in mass...:)

They should be trying to measure the Gravitational force of charged particles instead (a much more difficult endeavour)...

Coherent Nuclear Fusion -
The Path to Infinite and Safe Energy

----------------------------------------------

The Energy Book is available for download here
----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------

I wrote short blog about Coherent Nuclear Fusion sometime ago. As anything, one only pays attention to form (properly marketted ideas) as oppose to ideas simply told straight-up.

I had my equation for epsilon0, mu0 and G and any other derived cosmological constant since the beginning of times in my papers...:) I believe that only when I was able to create a picture of that equation in the forefront of my blog (right in front of your face) that that salient point was noticed.

It took time to realize that people are impervious to anything that doesn't hit them in the face..>:)

I decided to refresh another salient point or conclusion derived from my theory. I proposed the means to create an infinite source of energy in another of my postings: Coherent Nuclear Fusion.

Up to now, people have been colliding particles and trying to understanding what happens from those collisions.

That is a good start...:)

The problem with that is that this has been done in the dark and that should not be the case after I wrote my theory.

I proposed the experiment for the Large Hadron Collider: Collide particles which are traveling in the same direction, using a focusing magnetic lens... :)

This is a tremendous change in paradigm since a collider normally uses head-on collisions to maximize the collision energy...:)

This paradigm finesses the procedures used to create knowledge and nuclear fusion..>:)

The dilator paradigm and the Hypergeometrical Standard Model creates the ideological (theoretical) basis for this new kind of experimentation.

Having a focused beam of Deuterium and polarizing magnetic lensing should lead to coherent nuclear fusion processes with extremely high yield and achieved at much lower collision energy.

Needless to say, this should open a window into a new future, distant from the one we are rushing into now. Currently we are just going to extract all underground carbon and burn it...:) Any carbon taken from the ground makes Earth warmer and life worse.

Most likely I should make a picture of a beam and a two set of magnetic lenses: one to focus the beam and create fusion and another to redirect the beam back into the accelerator path.

Coming in a separable angle would be the products of the nuclear fusion. Of course, the same process could be used for coherent nuclear fission...:)

There are other sources of energy that I can envision and many unimaginable innovations (gravitational shielding, direct manipulation of the Fabric of Space, superluminal traveling, the ability to create non-interacting matter, etc)...

It will take time for me to explain everything since I can't find a single human that shows a basic understanding of this theory..>:) Maybe only the Aliens from Area 51 or those crafty scientists from Livermore..>:)

My goal is always To Serve Humans >:)

Cheers,

MP

Something that bothered me when I started building the theory was the fact that event thought one Kilogram of anything will atract another Kilogram of anything independently upon its composition, the same is not valid for a Kilogram of Charge...:)

That was a downer.... a real downer... How come the two units of charge Electron and Proton be so different... and yet so equal... Same charge... but one is 2000 times fatter than the other...

When I created the theory, I realized that for me to develop Gauss Electrostatic Law from first principles I had to use a Fat Electron instead of the skinny electron we know and learned to love...:)

For the calculation to work out, the electron mass (4D Volume) used in the RXYZ had to be equal to one atomic mass unit or the electron would also be a proton for half of its time... Like a secret identity...:)

Eventually I realized what was happening and proposed the concept of dilator and put one and one together and created the Fundamental Dilator..a chimera that is electron in a phase and a Proton in another phase... also an anti-electron and an anti-proton in other phases...

This was essential to the creation of the Theory of Everything... to see with the eyes of the mind... (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry would say, to see with the eyes of the heart)... That might be good enough for me at this time..

As you might well guessed, that little rocky planet reminds me the Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe where I live...:)

Cheers,

MP