I developed a hypothesis that if a number of people were to develop conceptual tools, aids, in order to envision abstract physics tangibly that ultimately all of us would eventually arrive at the same conclusion or results. These conceptual tools have to run on the premise of relativity, as all things in our minds relate to each other, so we can relate the abstract to something tangible and it be easily understood which then we would extrapolate the actuality of the abstract physics from the conceptual tool. For some of us this process might take longer and for others perhaps not so long. Essentially, I believe all of the scientific and non-scientific community have been heading towards the same conclusions and results. The only unfortunate thing is that certain existing theories are too complex and are presented at a level of complexity that to understand it tangibly requires much more effort thus much more time by a smaller percentage of the population before resulting at the same conclusions. This is not to say physics is simple, but the underlining concepts and approaches don't have to be complicated. Many of us focus strongly on the mathematics in hopes that it will enlighten us, which is good so don't misunderstand me such as it did for Einstein with E=mc^2, but we must be careful that the mathematics doesn't give us an imaginary representation on the actuality of physics. We are all physicists because we are all physical and live in a physical environment thus can understand it, to a certain level, tangibly, thus we also are able to manipulate it tangibly. If we all use this underlining understanding of physics then we can derive our own theories which based on my initial premise will eventually result at the same conclusions and results.