Introduction

Existing models which have attempted to integrate the core concepts of relativity with quantum physics remain controversial and incomplete. The prevailing consensus is that relativistic laws apply to the macro-environment, electrostatic and weak gravitational laws apply to the atomic and subatomic environment, while beyond Planck mass and length, within the singularity, the dimension remains undefined. These multi-faceted but incomplete models are further flawed by the conspicuous absence of any proposed hypothesis explaining the observed phenomenon of entanglement within a non-locality context in which occurs the supra-luminal transfer of information.

The fundamental requirement for any proposed unifying theory is that all the observed characteristics of time, mass and energy be incorporated without bias. The theory should also be firmly anchored within the extended, perceived environment and not diverge into an abstract mathematical form which may no longer reflect the dynamics of the environment that it represents. Mathematical modelling is essential in evolving and unifying any proposed physical theory. However when the symbolic representation of the physical environment becomes integrated within a mathematical language in which the language itself is governed by its own rules, a situation may arise in which the mathematics becomes an end in itself and no longer accurately reflects the extended physical environment. There are those subscribers to the non-locality thesis who would argue that following the observed influences of observer consciousness on entanglement, mathematical modelling itself may bring about observable changes in the physical environment. 

Universal Rotation and Oscillation

The theory which I propose has attempted to incorporate the diversity of observed and modelled physical phenomena. Each individual facet is equally respected and incorporated, conditional only to the validity of the preceding modelling or theorization.

I propose that the entire universe rotates with a peri-luminal angular velocity. This peri-luminal velocity ranges between sub and supra-luminal values. If the rotating universe is considered to be spherical in configuration then the outermost perimeter rotates consistently at supra-luminal velocities while the zone adjacent to the centre of rotation rotates consistently at a sub-luminal angular velocity. Following on from relativity, as a mass entity approaches luminal velocity c, it tends to infinite mass. At threshold mass and velocity we arrive at a Planck mass and length which then evolves into a black hole and subsequent emergence into singularity. Angular velocity along the circumference of rotation can be viewed as an average velocity of individual segments of circumference and velocity. With changing vectors of force and acceleration along the circumference there are incremental changes in angular velocity. The shortest measurable distance of individual segments of circumference are Planck Lengths. Therefore mass entities exit into singularity with velocity c and travelling through a distance of a Planck Length. As the circumferential path changes at the start of the next increment, the angular velocity has diminished to a sub-luminal value because the previous vectors of force and acceleration have diminished as the new vectors increase angular velocity in a different direction. Hence the mass re-emerges from singularity at the sub-luminal velocity, experiences the new vector influences, accelerates to threshold angular velocity and so the process repeats itself.

In effect what is postulated is an oscillation of mass (baryonic and non-baryonic) and its energy equivalent while within the dimensions of relativity and the singularity respectively. Within the dimension of relativity there is no velocity greater than luminal c. However within the non-locality milieu of the singularity, mass, time and distance tend to zero such that connectivity is instantaneous. It is in this latter dimension that the observed manifestation of non-locality can be adequately explained.

The vectors of force and acceleration require abundant energy to maintain luminal levels of angular velocity. Conversely the re-emergence of mass from singularity is accompanied by the gain of energy. The magnitude of this energy would be of the order of mc², following on from relativity. Consequently there is a pool of energy resulting from this energy emission and utilization which I postulate represents ubiquitous Dark Energy. It is the pool of Dark Energy which drives the angular velocity of the universe and which facilitates the mergence into singularity. Dark Energy will be detectable wherever the mass oscillation occurs. It is therefore deficient at or near the centre of universal rotation where sub-luminal angular velocities preclude oscillation and at the extreme periphery where singularity alone occurs. I further submit that energy absorption is a non-vectored phenomenon while the emission of energy on mass re-emergence is vectored.

Gravity, Inertia and Elecrostatic Forces

Non-vectored energy absorption gives rise to the gravitational force which is further manifest by the curve of relativistic space-time in the vicinity of substantial mass. Energy absorption at the molecular, atomic and subatomic levels gives rise to electrostatic attraction and is no different from the gravitational effects of the macro-sphere. Vectored energy emission gives rise to the expansion of the universe, Brownian movement and the integrity of atomic and molecular structure by preventing atomic collapse. The centripetal/centrifugal forces consequent upon the rotating universe further contribute to the expansion of the universe.

The physical properties of mass such as density, momentum and inertia are consequently regarded as a measure of the degree of energy absorption required in the oscillation process. The more the body mass, the more energy required for absorption and oscillation and the greater the gravitational value. At all levels of mass dimensions the competing processes of absorption and emission will occur. All subatomic components within any given mass body follow the circumferential trajectory in which each in turn passes into singularity at the Planck distance. Larger mass bodies comprise greater numbers of molecular and atomic components and therefore represent the summation of these components in terms of energy absorption and emission. Vectored emission within the body is randomly orientated and will therefore tend to cancel out significantly while absorption continues unopposed. The integrity of the mass within the relativistic domain therefore prevails. The existence of resultant vectored emission beyond the mass surface will contribute to the effects described previously.

Similarly, in the context of closely situated large body masses, vectored emission between the bodies is randomly orientated and will therefore tend to cancel out significantly while absorption continues unopposed. In this way the gravitational forces within a galaxy will offset the expansion of space-time due to the combined influence of emission and centripetal/centrifugal forces.

Molecular and atomic components which contribute to a greater mass are integrated into the collective absorption and emission dynamic of the mass entity. On fragmenting the mass into smaller molecular and atomic components, the characteristics of the opposing processes of absorption and emission will change. The opposing processes become more equally balanced and manifestations of each become more identifiable and more easily manipulated or biased into either direction. At this level the influence of the observer’s consciousness becomes more apparent and will contribute to Heisenberg uncertainty.

Orbiting Stars, Planets and Sub-atomic Particles

All relativistic mass structures are rotating at peri-luminal velocities as postulated previously. The range of mass structures extends from atomic and subatomic structures to large planets and stars. The angular momentum of rotating mass of all dimensions while within the relativistic domain encounters matter-energy “turbulence”. This “turbulence” reflects inter alia the consequences of Dark Energy absorption and emission as described above. I submit the hypothesis that the differential “drag” as well as the mass-related inertia gives rise to the orbiting motion of planets, stars and sub-atomic particles. The existence of spiral galaxies may be considered as an illustration of this process.

Information Transfer in the Singularity

The singularity may be defined as a dimension characterized by the presence of the energy equivalent of mass devoid of time, mass and distance. However the energy representation must be in the form of identifiable quanta which retain their individual integrity so that on return to relativistic conditions the mass is re-materialized. I submit further that within the singularity, the phenomenon of resonance occurs between similar energy quanta or through the harmonics thereof. This in itself would contribute to the connectedness of the dimension. In this way the instantaneous transfer of information takes place which may become manifest in mass entities on return to the relativistic dimension.

The living human brain within the relativistic dimension records information relating to mass, energy, distance and associations thereof. I contend that organically recorded information within the brain is itself subject to the oscillation described above and in this way will influence the energy equivalent quanta of mass entities within the singularity. The mode of influence is explained through resonance of the representative energy of the mass itself with the energy equivalent quantum representing the stored form of the mass and its associations within the neurological structures of the brain. Expressed in different terms, the energy interactions or perpetual flux of the singularity represent the Shrodinger wave of possibilities. It is the associations of the entities as represented in the human brain which biases specific resonant connections and which becomes manifest on re-materialization. This process in effect collapses a segment of the wave of possibilities. The influence of human consciousness upon the entanglement of non-locality observations has been clearly demonstrated. It appears that the human brain may be a convergence point through which flux originating within the singularity, attains manifestation by wave collapse within the domain of relativity.

The ‘Big Bang’ in the context of Universal Oscillation

In the context of this oscillation model an alternative theory is proposed as regards the ‘Big Bang’. In simple terms, the emergence of physical matter will occur when the angular velocity of the universe decreases to sub-luminal values. A differential will occur such that mass materializes closer to the centre of rotation, becomes more massive at pre-luminal velocities and de-materializes into singularity at the luminal and supra-luminal range. Matter will continue to materialize in the sub-luminal regions and move divergently towards the peripheral pre-luminal and luminal regions. This divergent movement occurs as a consequence of the centripetal/centrifugal forces of the rotating universe together with the contributing influence from the vectored emission derived from the oscillation process. At the periphery, in the luminal and supra-luminal regions, matter will dematerialize into the singularity.

As more mass emerges into singularity at the periphery, angular velocities in the regions closer to the centre of rotation will increase in order to conserve angular momentum. The increase in angular velocity will cause the singularity to effectively converge towards the centre of rotation. The increased angular velocity will also lead to an increase in the centripetal/centrifugal force causing the rate of expansion of the universe to increase. At a critical point near the centre of rotation the angular velocity will diminish significantly due to the shortened radius of rotation and new mass entities will precipitate out again into the relativistic dimension. Thereafter the process begins yet again perpetuating a cyclical process.

Correlates for the Centre of Rotation

Evidence is emerging that the centre of the Big Bang or the centre of Universal Rotation (in the context of this proposed model) is situated near the plane of the Milky Way. This has emerged from studies of quantized redshift. As indicated previously, the centre of rotation would necessarily comprise a large body of older, substantial mass. The super-cluster, the Great Attractor, fulfils most of the required criteria both in baryonic configuration and location (near the constellation of Centaurus, 7 degrees off the plane of the Milky Way).

Summary

I have proposed a theory based on the hypothesis that the entire universe perpetually rotates with an angular velocity in the peri-luminal range. Through circumferential increments in the range of Planck distances, matter forms into black holes and emerges into singularity. An instantaneous transfer of information takes place in the singularity through probable resonance of representative energy quanta. Due to incremental changes of force and acceleration along the circumference, angular velocity will diminish intermittently facilitating the re-materialization of matter into the relativistic dimension. The re-materialization of matter is associated with the emission of vectored energy which contributes to the expansion of the universe, Brownian movement and further prevents the collapse of the atom. This energy which derives from emission is the source of Dark Energy. Dark Energy serves to maintain the angular velocity of rotation of the universe and thereby, the emergence into singularity. A perpetual cycle then becomes discernable in which matter materializes near the centre of rotation, moves divergently in an expanding universe to the periphery and then emerges into singularity in the regions where angular velocity reaches perpetual luminal and supra-luminal dimensions.

References

1. Barrau, A.,J Grain J. (2004), The case for mini black holes, CERN Courier 44(9)

2. Bell, J. (1987), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , Cambridge University Press

3. Chiao, R.Y., Kwiat, P.G., and Steinberg, A.M. (1993),Faster than Light?, Scientific American, August

4. Hameroff, S., Penrose, R. (1996), In: Towards a Science of Consciousness – The First Tucson Discussions and Debates, eds. Hameroff, S.R., Kaszniak, A.W. and Scott, A.C., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp 507-540

5. Napier, W.M. and Guthrie, B.N.G.(1997), Quantized redshifts: a status report, J. Astrophysics and Astronomy 18(4):455–463