- Home
- TOE Theories
- Aether Physics Model
- A New Foundation for Physics
A New Foundation for Physics
- By David Thomson
- Published 09/22/2005
- Aether Physics Model
-
Rating:




Summary
The Aether Physics Model (APM) is a new quantum physics paradigm, which is based upon
- a clearer definition of dimensions
- a different structure of units based upon distributed charge dimensions
- a new system of units based on electron values
- the structure of non-material existence (Aether)
- a new system of geometrical evaluation
- new fundamental constants in addition to the established fundamental constants
- the quantification of a new type of charge
- and the quantification of matter as angular momentum
We can postulate that the Universe composes from force, matter, and environment. Space-time is a subset of "environment," which is quantified as Aether. The ontology of the APM assumes quantum matter exists within a quantum environment, and that the quantum environment constructs from primary force acting on quantum dimensional measurements. Let us assume the force as primary, and demonstrate that it factors from Coulomb's constant and Newton's gravitational constant. We name the primary force "Gforce" and assume it is constant, and thus the Universe is a closed system. In this paper, we do not present Gforce as a derived constant from constants that are more fundamental.
Some of the differences between the APM and Standard Model (SM) of particle physics are:
|
Some Differences Between the Aether Physics Model and Standard Model Table 1 |
|
|
Aether Physics Model |
Standard Model |
|
Length, Frequency, Mass and Charge are strictly dimensions |
Mass is considered to be a unit, and "charge" is often confused to be synonymous with "electron." |
|
Length, Frequency, Mass and Charge are entirely non-material and yet measurable. |
Mass is sometimes considered to be matter and is hypothesized to be, or be composed of, a Higgs Boson particle. The dimension of mass is also thought to be equivalent to the unit of energy. Charge is thought of as a point particle. |
|
All units construct from distributed charge dimensions. |
Units construct from single charge dimensions in all units except inductance, permeability, capacitance, permittivity, and conductance. This leads to the incorrect relationship between certain units. |
|
All units construct from quantum measurements, particularly the values related to the electron. |
Units construct from measurements having no relationship to the quantum realm, such as meter, kilogram, gram, second, and coulomb. SI system of units employs the unit of current in place of charge dimension. |
|
The quantum Aether unit quantifies as the quantum of space-time (four dimensions) and space-resonance (five dimensions). Aether dimensionally integrates with matter. |
Space-time is an artificial, mathematical coordinate system. Space-time has no inherent connection to matter. |
|
The Aether Physics Model quantifies the geometry of charge, Aether, and subatomic particles. |
Charge and quantum matter quantify as dimensionless points, and the Aether is ignored. |
|
Conductance of the Aether is a new fundamental constant, derived from Coulomb's constant, the speed of light, permeability, and permittivity. |
There is no Aether and the conductance of free space is not recognized. |
|
Elementary charge squared is electrostatic charge and strong charge quantifies as the angular momentum of the subatomic particle times the conductance of the Aether. |
The only type of charge recognized is the elementary charge and it expresses in single dimension charge. This creates problems in the cgs system of units, where charge appears naturally as distributed. |
|
The electron quantifies as the quantum of action, or Planck's constant. The electron, proton, and neutron do not just have angular momentum; their structure is angular momentum. |
Subatomic particles have mass, charge, angular momentum, energy, and other characteristics, but have no particular structure. |
The Aether Physics Model (APM) is mathematical and based on the same data as the SM. The main difference between the two models is the ontology of how we explain the data. Nevertheless, this is exactly what modern physics needs, a fresh perspective, and a new way of seeing the familiar data.
